Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. It would be good if the sources turned up in this discussion could make their way into the article. A Train^talk 13:06, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton

Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject fails WP:NCORP, WP:GNG due to the lack of in-depth coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. The article fails WP:NOTADVERTISING. Rentier (talk) 00:36, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

• Keep - Although this article is not well sourced at the moment, Sheppard Mullin is most certainly a notable international law firm. It's consistently Vault 100 ranked, has played prominent roles in notable legal events, and they are large and notable enough that prominent legal industry publications cover hiring and personnel changes. This article needs serious improvement in terms of provided sources and tone, but ample secondary sources exist to establish notability. Shelbystripes (talk) 06:21, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:06, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

• Keep Per Shelbystripes. Also dug up some further coverage. [1] Brustopher (talk) 13:13, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.